×

Woman Asks If She’s Wrong For Double Reporting An Employee To His Boss And Corporate And Getting Him Fired

When it comes to addressing serious issues like discrimination or hate speech, it’s essential to take appropriate and effective actions. Navigating these situations can be challenging, especially when trying to balance personal feelings with the need for justice. Sometimes, taking extra steps to ensure a matter is handled correctly is necessary, even if it means revisiting the issue with higher authorities. The goal is always to uphold standards of respect and equality, ensuring that inappropriate behavior is addressed and corrected.

OP and her African American husband have a 15-year-old biracial son. While teaching her son to drive, he accidentally cut off a truck, leading the driver to shout the N-word at him. The incident deeply upset OP’s son. OP reported the driver’s behavior to his company, which promised to handle it, as their trucks have dashcams. Two months later, OP saw a photo on the company’s Facebook page showing the offending driver still employed. Scroll down below to read what happened next.

OP wonders if it was right to “double-report” the driver or if she was being vindictive. Did OP go too far by reporting the incident a second time?

via Reddit

Image credits: ANTONI SHKRABA production (not the actual photo)

1. OP asks if it was wrong to report an employee’s r*cist behavior to both his boss and corporate, potentially leading to his termination.

2. OP and her African American husband have a 15-year-old biracial son who recently got his driver’s permit and accidentally cut off a truck.

3. OP scolded her son and apologized to the driver, who then shouted the N-word at her son, leaving him pale and depressed for the rest of the drive.

4. OP researched the company on Facebook, finding it active and proud of its good image and customer service.

5. OP reported the man’s behavior to the company, who identified him and confirmed his actions were on dashcam, assuring OP they would handle the situation.

6. Two months later, OP saw the company’s Facebook page and checked it out out of curiosity for the first time since reporting.

7. One of the first posts showed employees in the company yard, including the man who shouted at OP’s son, meaning he wasn’t fired.

8. OP watched the employee get fired and leave the salon, muttering about a “lawyer” under her breath.

9. OP called the corporate headquarters, reported the incident to the highest person available, and complained about how they didn’t fire the employee.

10. The corporate representative was disgusted, apologized profusely, stated racists have “no place” in the company, and gave OP confidence the employee’s career is now over.

11. Was OP wrong to “double-report” the employee? Despite potential consequences from the first report, OP wonders if pursuing the matter further was too much.

via Reddit

Upset by the behavior of the employee, OP called the corporate headquarters to report the incident again. The corporate representative seemed more concerned and assured OP that racists have no place in the company.

Now that you have read the story, it’s time for you to see what Redditors had to say about the story. Don’t forget to share your own opinion at the end of this article.

12. You had every right to escalate the issue to corporate after seeing no action was taken.

13. Reporting the behavior to ensure accountability is commendable.

14. You’re not a ‘Karen’ for seeking justice.

15. The initial response was inadequate, and taking further action was necessary to address the discrimination.

16. If he behaved better, he would have still been here.

17. Double-reporting was the right call, especially if the company didn’t handle it as expected.

18. It’s crucial to hold companies accountable for their employees’ actions.

19. Your follow-up ensured that the behavior was appropriately addressed, which is important.

20. It’s crucial to ensure such behavior is properly addressed.

via Reddit

The story highlights the importance of holding companies accountable for discriminatory behavior and the need to persist in seeking justice when initial responses are inadequate. It emphasizes that taking further action to address raci** is not vindictive but necessary for ensuring fair treatment.

What are your thoughts on this story? What would you do, or how would you react if you were in OP’s position? You know that your feedback means a lot to us; therefore, we want you to share your thoughts in the comment section below. For more such articles, keep visiting our website. Have a nice day!

Send this to a friend