OP, who worked for 11 weeks at a company, was fired a few days ago for requesting her to cover for four weeks of absences, which would have resulted in financial loss. OP, who was the lowest-paid employee, refused to go and was given a two-week notice. A few days after her termination, the company started texting her about covering for them, which she declined. She also offered to cover $4000 per 8-hour shift and $1000 for any hour after that. The company responded that she was unreasonable, claiming she didn’t understand the importance of an Easter vacation for them. The OP concludes that the situation is becoming increasingly idiosyncratic and dense.
If you want to know if OP is an A-hole or not, you will have to read the complete story that he narrates, so keep scrolling down below.
1. After firing OP, her former supervisor contacted her to come back and cover for other people’s vacations.
2. According to the OP, his supervisor is becoming ridiculously stupid. The OP was contacted by the company he worked for, requesting that she come in and catch up so that others may take holidays. does that even make sense?
3. The OP informed the users that the situation is that she was dismissed a few days ago because the employer wanted him to move out of state for four weeks, and because she refused, they gave him two weeks’ notice and fired him. She was the newest and lowest-paid employee.
5. The fact that they all pretended OP was being unreasonable; she doesn’t have kids after all, and how important is it that they take an Easter break while OP would have been at work?
Leave your opinions about this malicious compliance story in the comment area below, and don’t forget to give it a like and share it with your loved ones and friends. Continue to check back with Defused for further content. Thank You!
