Wife Asks If She’s Wrong For Asking For A Legal Contract Before Giving Money To Husband

• By Adina Tayyab
• January 30, 2024
• 3 minutes read

OP (36F) is two years into marriage with her husband (42M), who has a history of financial struggles and borrowing money. Recently, he sought 14k, claiming it was for the kids. When OP requested a signed repayment contract, he became angry, called her useless, and spent the night away. Despite the confrontation, OP stood firm on her condition, insisting on transparency about the loan’s purpose. In their subsequent discussion, the husband refused to disclose details. A conflict arises over OP’s demand for a contract, with the husband questioning trust. Is OP wrong for insisting on this condition?

OP (36F) married her husband (42M) two years ago, both with previous marriages and his six kids. He wants separate finances, but his financial habits worry OP.

via Reddit

OP’s husband (m42) borrowed money, claiming it’s for the kids, but OP, suspicious about the necessity for teenagers, asked for details.

via Reddit

OP’s husband requested 14k, but when asked for the purpose, he refused to share and got upset when OP insisted on a signed contract for repayment.

via Reddit

OP insister her husband on contact but he didn’t agree and kept on blaming OP to be wrong.

via Reddit

An update on the story. OP’s husband got upset, calling her “f*cking useless” after she insisted on a signed contract before lending him money. He left the house in anger.

via Reddit

The story highlights a person’s concern about lending a significant amount of money to their husband due to a lack of transparency. The narrator insists on a signed contract to ensure the money is returned, but the husband reacts negatively, avoiding details and leaving the house upset. It emphasizes the importance of open communication and responsibility in financial matters, as well as the need for trust and understanding within a family.

Scroll down till the end to read the full story.

Setting conditions for a significant loan is reasonable.

NTA – Your conditions for the loan are sensible. Financial boundaries are essential, and your husband’s reaction is concerning.

Protecting your finances with a contract is reasonable. Your husband’s refusal to provide details raises suspicion.

Your request for a contract is fair given the circumstances.

NTA – Your husband’s resistance to a contract raises red flags. Financial agreements within a marriage require open communication and trust.

The husband is in the wrong here.

What are your thoughts on this story? What would you do, or how would you react if you were in OP’s position? You know that your feedback means a lot to us; therefore, we want you to share your thoughts in the comment section below. For more such articles, keep visiting Defused. Have a nice day!

Cat tax

“Who else is currently telling their baby they are the cutest girl/boy in the whole entire world?”

via Reddit